|
It is 100% certain you're headed for Hell ...
for rejecting the Catholic Dogma ...
Warning: There are no bishops or priests in these times
1. The Original Sin of Adam closed Heaven for all men (sanctifying grace was lost) ... Hell became the only possible destination for the immortal souls of men.
7. One can still be Catholic and get to Heaven with a proper baptism in water
[Section 7] ... believing the Dogmas ... and keeping free from mortal sin. [Section 10.1]
E-mail > Slave_BVM@mail.com -- Catholic-Dogma-Providers@mail.com
<<< --- <<< --- <<< --- <<< --- Start Section 105.3 --- >>> --- >>> --- >>> --- >>>
The "sspx" cult's deceptive use of the "canon law" hoax ...
Catholic writing of 2 Saint John 1:9
Catholic writing of Titus 3:10-11
~ ~ ~
Introduction:
1. The "1917 and 1983 codes of canon law" are non-Catholic heretical documents ... as is proven on Section 105.1 ... whatever writing is opposed to Catholic Dogma is not a writing of the Catholic Church.
2. Both of these "codes" were ... put together by heretics ... benedict-15 (Section 20) and john paul 2 (Section 12.6). Since these two were automatically excommunicated for heresy ... they could not legislate for the Catholic Church which they were not even in.
3. Given the facts of No. 1 and 2 above > The "sspx" hoax is using a non-Catholic heretical document, promulgated by heretics, to try to justify their existence. This is a centuries old strategy ... trying to convince people that your group is Christian ... this time by employing "canon law" ... all to fool their adherents and send them automatically excommunicated into Hell.
4. If you set aside Numbers 1 and 2 above for a moment ... even if there was a Catholic code of canon (which there isn't) ... man-made canon law cannot be used to go against Catholic Sources of Dogma (Divine Law) on any subject which is covered in the Divine Law. The subject of Jurisdiction and Governance of the Catholic Church is covered in the Divine Law.
5. The "sspx" heretic cult has been mindlessly screaming for decades ... that a small committee of people in a non-Dogmatic venue ... can slap together "canon laws" which supersede Dogma from the Pope in union with the bishops of the world.
6. The heresies in the "1917 code" and "1983 code" are on Section 105.1 Sub-parts B and C. So connecting the satanic dots, heresies of "benedict-15" are on Section 20 and... "benedict-15" also issues a heretical "canon law" as a further mechanism to attack souls by making people think there is such a thing as "supplied jurisdiction".
7. The sspx is jumping on the "benedict-15" and "john paul 2" bandwagons ... of "supplied jurisdiction" from the bogus "canon laws" ... to ease people into Hell with the "Latin Mass Rite" that they stole from the Catholic Church.
8. Using man-made "canon law" ... to go against the Dogma of the Holy Spirit is also heresy against the Dogma listed in Section 3.3 ... which states that the Catholic Faith is defined by the Pope in union with the Bishops.
9. Section 105.2 lists ... some of the specific heresies and lies of ... "sspx" group leaders Peter Scott and Bernard Tissier in their lame attempts to use the "1917 code" in defense of the heresy of "supplied Jurisdiction" to keep their cult going ... which is sending all of its people into Hell with no exception. Section 99 identifies the fact that there is no such thing as "supplied jurisdiction".
~ ~ ~
Listed below are the "canon law" paragraphs that the "sspx" has on their website ... which they illicitly employ put on stage shows that look like Catholic Mass. They have been able to copy what they stole from the Catholic Church ... with lay people dressed like priests. The fake "Masses" are all mortal sins against the First Commandment (worship of a non-Catholic "god").
The "sspx" attempt to use "canon law" to violate the Catholic Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma used to be at URL ...
previously at:
The "sspx" continually changes their URLs because their heresy is being identified.
Again, the specific lies of Peter Scott and Bernard Tissier on these matters ... are on the previous Section of this website ... Section 105.2.
"canon 209" of the "1917 code" to ... set up Catholic looking ... non-Catholic liturgies:
Section 1 - On Clerics in general, Title 5, On Ordinary and Delegated Power, Canon 209
Canon 209:
"In common error or in positive or probable doubt about either law or fact, the Church supplies Jurisdiction: for both the external and internal forum."
Catholic refutation:
1. There is no "common error" and there is no "probable doubt" , regarding the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance which is clearly listed in the Council of Florence and the Vatican Council of 1870 and on Section 87. So this "canon" 209 cannot be applied to any matters related to Jurisdiction and Governance.
2. Regarding the text: "positive or probable doubt" --> This Canon 209 contains the heresy of "supplied Jurisdiction", a lie against the Faith as shown on Section 99.
Also, "canon 209" is lying that there is "positive or probable doubt" regarding the defined Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. The Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma has been clearly defined and are listed on Section 87. Neither the sspx or vatican-2 can grant Jurisdiction to any person or group to act as a Catholic entity.
3. Regarding the text: "common error" --> Also, there is no "common error" with Catholics who care enough to take 5 minutes to read the un-ambiguous Dogmatic decrees regarding Jurisdiction and Governance, which were covered five times at the Vatican Council of 1870 because God knew that groups would set up non-Jurisdictional entities and put on stage shows that look like "Mass".
4. Regarding the text: "supplies Jurisdiction" --> A search of the texts of the Catholic world wide Councils ... and the Denzinger (Sources of Catholic Dogma) shows that there is not a single instance of the words "supplies Jurisdiction" or "supplied Jurisdiction". This fraud of "supplied Jurisdiction" is a non-Catholic fiction and heresy from top to bottom, those who propagated it lost their souls (if they died in that state), those who currently propagate it are all headed for Hell. Again, see Section 99 for ... "supplied jurisdiction" refuted.
"canon 20" of the "1917 code" to ... set up Catholic looking ... non-Catholic liturgies: Title 1 - On Ecclesiastical Laws, Canon 20
Canon 20:
"If on a given matter there is lacking an express prescription of law, whether general or particular, the rule is to be surmised, unless it concerns the application of a penalty, from laws laid down in similar cases; (then) from the general principles of law observed with canonical equity; (then) from the style and practice of the Roman Curia; and (finally) from the common and constant opinions of the doctors."
Catholic refutation:
1. Regarding the text: "If on a given matter there is lacking an express prescription of law" --> There is not in any way a "lacking of express law" regarding Jurisdiction and Governance of the Catholic Church. These express laws (both general and particular) are covered in the Divine Law (the Catholic Dogma) from the Council of Florence and the Vatican Council of 1870 which address Jurisdiction and Governance ... listed on Section 87.
2. Regarding the text: "canonical equity" (also called epikeia) --> Canonical equity can only be used against man-made law (i.e. not keeping to the letter of man-made law) ... it cannot be used against the Divine Law (to not keep to the letter of the Divine Law, the Catholic Dogma). So the man-made concept of "canonical equity" cannot be used against ... the Catholic defined Dogma which addresses Jurisdiction and Governance.
3. Regarding the text: "unless it concerns the application of a penalty" --> "Canonical equity" is only used for issues specifically related to "application of a penalty" ... this is the only context in which "canonical equity" can be employed "from the general principles of law". In this Canon 20, the phrase (canonical equity, also called "epikeia") is not even attempting to apply epikeia to the Catholic Dogma regarding Jurisdiction or Governance (which it can’t legally do anyway). Trying to apply this Canon 20 to Catholic Jurisdiction and governance is completely fraudulent.
4. The Divine Law (the Dogma) regarding Jurisdiction and governance clearly states that the Catholic Church is a single entity, of one Jurisdiction and Governance around the whole world under the See of Peter.
There are no groups in the world who meet this definition of Jurisdiction and Governance ... so that they are not a Catholic entities. The vatican-2 heretic cult (founded in 1965) doesn’t because ... they have no bishops, and so no Pope ... to operate according to the Jurisdiction Dogma. The fake "traditionalists" groups around the world ... are in the same boat as vatican-2. There is no Pope to grant Jurisdiction (according to the Dogma on Section 87) ... to groups such as ... "sspx" , "sspv", "Thuc line", "cmri", other "independents", etc. ... so that they cannot be Catholic entities. Like vatican-2, none of these groups have priests or Bishops, it's all playacting.
"canon 207" of the "1917 code" to ... set up Catholic looking ... non-Catholic liturgies:
Section 1 - On Clerics in general, Title 5, On Ordinary and Delegated Power, Canon 207
Canon 207:
"§ 1. Delegated power is extinguished by completion of the mandate; (likewise) by the elapse of time; (likewise) by exhaustion of the number of cases for which it was granted, by the cessation of the final cause of the delegation, by revocation of the one delegating directly communicated to the delegate, or by resignation of the one delegated communicated directly to the one delegating and accepted by him, but not by the loss of authority on the part of the one delegating, except for the two cases mentioned in Canon 61."
"§ 2. But for power granted for the internal forum, an act placed inadvertently after the elapse of time or exhaustion of the number of cases is valid."
"§ 3. When there are several delegated collegially, if one ceases (to have power), the delegation of the others also ceases, unless something else is shown by the tenor of the delegation."
Catholic refutation:
1. Regarding the text: "Delegated power" --> This reference to "delegated power" is for completion of an assigned task or activity, the "delegated power" has nothing to do with the Catholic Dogma regarding Jurisdiction and Governance which is unchanging and unchangeable.
So the "sspx" ... cannot use this "delegated power" construct to ... fabricate "supplied jurisdiction".
2. The Catholic Sacraments, including the Mass (no longer available because there are no priests) ... are legally dispensed only in accordance with the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.
So that the "delegated power" that is being referred to here cannot possibly mean that this "delegated power" is to be applied to the Sacraments ... or "employed" to ignore the Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma ... to rationalize putting on stage shows that look like "Mass" ... which is all the sspx and vatican-2 is capable of since they have no priests.
3. The "delegated power" discussed here is something which lapses (comes to an end) ... so it must be referring to tasks, work groups, disciplinary actions, etc. ... and not to the Sacraments which are governed by the Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma.
The only Sacrament that exists in these times is water Baptism. Water Baptism is also the only Sacrament that is ... Necessity of Means (must have to get to Heaven).
*Do not* under any circumstances go to a guy who is dressed like a priest for Baptism ... he will falsify the Baptism (make it invalid) ... by going against the Dogma listed on Section 7.1.1 ... go to someone you can trust.
"canon 882" of the "1917 code" to ... implement Catholic looking ... fake Sacramental Confession:
Title 4 - On Penance, Chapter 1 - On the Minister of the Sacrament of Penance, Canon 882
Canon 882:
"In danger of death all priests and bishops, even those not approved for confessions, validly and licitly absolve all penitents whatsoever of all sins and censures whatsoever, no matter how reserved or notorious, even if there is present an approved priest, with due regard for the prescription of Canons 884 and 2252."
Catholic refutation:
1. This canon is heresy against the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance as listed in the Council of Florence and the Vatican Council of 1870. These dogmatic decrees state that Catholic Jurisdiction and governance have one and only one source - under the See of Peter hierarchically, throughout the whole world.
2. The Catholic Dogma on what to do ... for confession when there is no priest available is outlined on Section 10.2 of the website. Confessing your sins to God, with perfect contrition (sorrow for sins because they offend God, not because of the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell) ... together with the disposition of soul that you would go to a priest if one was available ... and a firm purpose of amendment ... places you back into a state of grace.
The Catholic teaching addressing the non-availability of confession is taught three times by the Council of Trent. God knew we were going to be in the situation we are in now regarding the loss of all Catholic property around the world to the vatican-2 heresy ... and disappearance of the Catholic clergy (no one is ordained) ... so that sacramental confession would not be available ... and God does not command impossibilities in terms of getting to Heaven.
3. God informs us via the Council of Trent that we are not to go to non-Jurisdictional entities for "confession" ... since there is no such thing as forgiveness of sins outside of the Catholic Church (see the citation following Trent citations).
The Trent citations are:
Council of Trent, Fourteenth Session, Chapter 4, On Contrition >
Council of Trent, Sixth Session, Chapter 14, on Justification >
By this teaching from the Council of Trent ... if we have the disposition to go to sacramental confession if it was available ... have perfect contrition in confessing our sins directly to God ... and a firm purpose of amendment ... our souls are placed back into a state of grace.
- - - - - - - - - -
And lastly on this point, the Catholic Church has defined that there is no remission of sins outside of the Catholic Church.
So there is no remission of sins in the vatican-2 heretic cult or in any of the fake "traditionalist" groups ... sspx, cmri, sspv, Thuc line, independents, etc.
By the below Ex-Cathedra statement there is no sacramental absolution of sins in the vatican-2 cult or in the other ... Dogma violating non-Jurisdictional groups ("sspx" , "sspv", "Thuc line", "cmri", other "independents", etc.)
Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, 18 Nov 1302, Ex-Cathedra > "canon 2252" of the "1917 code" to ... implement Catholic looking, fake Sacramental Confession:
Section 2 - On penalties in specific, Title 8 - On medicinal penalties or censures, Chapter 1 - On censures in general, Canon 2252
Canon 2252:
"Those constituted in danger of death can receive from a priest, without special faculties, absolution from any censure of man or from a censure most specially reserved to the Apostolic See, (but) are bound after recovering by the obligation of taking recourse under pain of reincidence to him who passed the censure, if it concerned a censure of man; (similarly) to the S. Penitentiary or to a Bishop or another endowed with the faculty according to the norm of Canon 2254, § 1, if it was a censure of law; and they must obey his mandates."
Catholic refutation:
1. A "censure" in the Catholic Church is a penalty. The subject of this Canon 2252 is about lifting of penalties ... it has absolutely nothing to do with ... in danger of death sacramental confession.
This "canon 2252" can’t be used to legislate against the Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma defined in the Councils of Florence and Vatican 1870 ... to instantiate confession. Please see previous record regarding Canon 882.
2. What this canon is referring to (in all likelihood) is the the Bull: Apostolicae Sedis Moderationi of Pius IX (1846-78) which regulates anew the system of censures and reservations in the Catholic Church.
"canon 2261" of the "1917 code" to ... implement Catholic looking, fake Sacramental Confession and other Catholic looking actions:
Section 2 - On penalties in specific, Title 8 - On medicinal penalties or censures, Chapter 1 - On censures in general, Canon 2261
Canon 2261:
"§ 1. One excommunicated is prohibited from confecting and administering licitly the Sacraments and Sacramentals, except for the exceptions that follow:"
"§ 2. The faithful, with due regard for the prescription of Para 3, can for any just cause seek the Sacraments and Sacramentals from one excommunicated, especially if other ministers are lacking, and then the one who is excommunicate and approached can administer these and is under no obligation of inquiring the reasons from the one requesting."
"§ 3. But from a banned excommunicate and from others excommunicated after a condemnatory or declaratory sentence has come, only the faithful in danger of death can ask for sacramental absolution according to the norm of Canons 882 and 2252 and even, if other ministers are lacking, other Sacraments and Sacramentals."
Catholic refutation:
1. This "canon 2261" is heresy against of the Divine Law, the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance ... listed on Section 87 of this site.
2. If someone is automatically excommunicated for heresy for going against any Dogma of the Church, he is spiritually outside of the Catholic Church so he cannot minister the Sacraments of the Church.
3. This is another attempt to get people to not confess ... in accordance with the Dogma on Section 10.2 of this site. The Section 10.2 Dogmas are specifically for times when sacramental confession is not available ... like now.
A couple citations ... for when there were priests and bishops ...
Pope Leo XIII >
Saint Augustine, Doctor of the Church > "canon 878" of the "1917 code" to ... implement Catholic looking, fake Sacramental Confession:
Title 4 - On Penance, Chapter 1 - On the Minister of the Sacrament of Pencance, Canon 878
Canon 878:
"§ 1. Delegated Jurisdiction or permission for hearing confession can be granted within certain established bounds."
"§ 2. Nevertheless, local Ordinaries and religious Superiors should take care lest Jurisdiction or permission be unduly limited without reasonable cause."
Catholic refutation:
1. Delegated Jurisdiction as opposed to Ordinary Jurisdiction of a geographical bishop, can be granted by a local Ordinary. This canon does not apply to anyone in the world at this time, since there are no Ordinaries in the hierarchical structure under the See of Peter ... the vatican-2 cult does not have bishops or the Papacy (only the Catholic Church has bishops and the Papacy (offices not filled in these times)) ... to grant Jurisdiction to a local Ordinary (so that he can then delegate).
2. This is another case where the "sspx" is rejecting a Catholic Dogma ... they are rejecting the Dogma on Automatic Excommunication for heresy which applies to everyone who is a physical participant in the non-Catholic vatican-2 cult.
3. If there were Ordinaries in the hierarchal structure under the See of Peter (which there are none now) ... then and only then would Paragraph 2 of this canon apply. But in these times those who are occupying the offices which were previously held by Catholic Church bishops ... were never consecrated as bishops ... so they have no power or Catholic Jurisdiction to delegate to others.
4. No other group in the world can grant delegated Jurisdiction because the groups in violation of the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance are not Catholic entities, these groups include ... vatican-2, "sspx" , "sspv", "Thuc line", "cmri", other "independents", etc.
5. Again, the deception and heresy here is that the "sspx" is saying that the vatican-2-ists are Catholic when they’re not.
"canon 1098" of the "1917 code" to ... make non-Sacramental Marriage look Sacramental ... the Marriages are valid:
Title 7 - On Marriage, Chapter 6 - On the Form of the celebration of Marriage, Canon 1098
Canon 1098:
"If the pastor or Ordinary or delegated priest who assists at marriage according to the norm of Canons 1095 and 1096 cannot be had or cannot be present without grave inconvenience:"
"1. In danger of death marriage is contracted validly and licitly in the presence only of witnesses; and outside of dangers of death provided it is prudently foreseen that this condition will perdure for a month;"
"2. In either case, if another priest can be present, he shall be called and together with the witnesses must assist at marriage, with due regard for conjugal validity solely in the presence of witnesses."
Catholic refutation:
1. This Canon 1098 is in the context of Ordinaries and priests who do have normal Jurisdiction in accordance with the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance ... which no one has in these times.
2. It is simply stating that a stand-in priest can be used for a marriage, or the marriage can be performed with witnesses only.
3. Neither this, nor any other "canon law" paragraph can be used ... to justify stage shows that look like Catholic Mass ... against the Divine Law, the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance ... listed on Section 87 of this site.
www.sspx.org/SSPX_FAQs/q9_Jurisdiction.htm
The objective is generate a plausible lie ... to their people that the fake "Masses" are "allowable" ... which causes their automatic excommunication and shoves them toward Hell. ~ ~ ~
"canon 1357" of the "1983 code" to ... Set up Catholic looking remittance of heresy without making an Abjuration: Part I. Delicts and Penalties in General Title VI. The Cessation of Penalties, (Cann. 1354 - 1363), Canon 1357
Canon 1357:
"§ 1. Without prejudice to the prescripts of cann. 508 and 976, a confessor can remit in the internal sacramental forum an undeclared latae sententiae censure of excommunication or interdict if it is burdensome for the penitent to remain in the state of grave sin during the time necessary for the competent superior to make provision."
"§ 2. In granting the remission, the confessor is to impose on the penitent, under the penalty of reincidence, the obligation of making recourse within a month to the competent superior or to a priest endowed with the faculty and the obligation of obeying his mandates; in the meantime he is to impose a suitable penance and, insofar as it is demanded, reparation of any scandal and damage; however, recourse can also be made through the confessor, without mention of the name."
"§ 3. After they have recovered, those for whom an imposed or declared censure or one reserved to the Apostolic See has been remitted according to the norm of can. 976 are also obliged to make recourse."
Catholic refutation:
This "canon" is heresy ... against the Catholic Sources of Dogma which mandate making a Formal Abjuration ... to re-enter the Catholic Church after falling into heresy or after participation in a heretical society. This Dogma is listed on Section 40.1 ... non-Dogma citations that one must Abjure are on Section 40.2.
A couple of citations regarding abjuration to re-enter the Church (that this "canon 1357" is in heresy against) are:
First Council of Constantinople, 381 A.D., Canon 7 >
Lateran Council III, 1179 A.D., Canon 27 > "canon 144" of the "1983 code" to ... set up Catholic looking non-Catholic liturgies:
Title VIII. The Power of Governance (Cann. 129-144), Canon 144
Canon 144:
"§ 1. In factual or legal common error and in positive and probable doubt of law or of fact, the Church supplies executive power of governance for both the external and internal forum."
"§ 2. The same norm is applied to the faculties mentioned in cann. 882, 883, 966, 1111, § 1."
Catholic refutation:
1. This "canon 144" is heresy against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. There is one and only one source of Catholic Jurisdiction and Governance ... that is from the See of Peter (not filled at this time) in a hierarchal structure throughout the whole world. Fictional "canon law" cannot override the Dogma.
2. Same as Number 1 above, with the other faculties in canons 883, 966, 1111, § 1.
3a. Again ... the "1983 Code" is from the non-Catholic vatican-2 cult founded in 1965 ... automatically excommunicated heretic "john paul 2" could not promulgate legislation for the Catholic Church ... which he was not even in (proven on Section 36, Sub-part A of this site).
3b. Anything that "john paul 2" sent out ... was not going to the Catholic Church ... it was going out to the vatican-2 heresy (founded on 8 December 1965).
A couple of "john paul 2" notes ...
Heretic "john paul 2" was not ... even ordained a priest. On 1 November 1946 it looked like ... Adam Stefan Sapieha was ordaining Wojtyla (jp-2) but he wasn't because in 1925 anti-Pope "pius-11" was automatically excommunicated for heresy. Since "pius-11" was excommunicated he could not grant Catholic Jurisidctional powers to Adam Sapieha to be Bishop of Krakow Poland ... so Sapieha did not ordain Wojtyla.
Heretic "john paul 2" was not ... made a bishop, also for reasons of Jurisdiction. On 28 September 1958 it looked like Eugeniusz Baziak was making Wojtyla a bishop but he wasn't. The reason for this is that Pacelli (a.k.a. "pius-12") was automatically excommunicated for heresy and being outside the Catholic Church he could not grant Jurisdictional powers to Baziak ... so that Baziak did not make Wojtyla a bishop in 1958.
"canon 142" of the "1983 code" to ... set up Catholic looking non-Catholic liturgies:
Title VIII. The Power of Governance (Cann. 129-144), canon 142
Canon 142:
"§ 2. Nevertheless, an act of delegated power which is exercised for the internal forum alone and is placed inadvertently after the lapse of the time limit of the grant is valid."
Catholic refutation:
1. This "canon 142" ... assumes there is a source which is able to assign ... delegated power, there isn't. The sspx, like vatican-2, has no bishops ... because Lefebvre was automatically excommunicated for heresy on 8 December 1965.
2. Regarding the text: "Delegated power" --> This reference to "delegated power" is for completion of an assigned task or activity, the "delegated power" has nothing to do with the Catholic Dogma regarding Jurisdiction and Governance which is unchanging and unchangeable.
3. It is heresy to say that "delegated power" for a period of time can supersede the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance, it can’t. If the See of Peter was operational (and not vacant) then a delegation of power could take place through the local geographic Ordinary (bishop) within the single world wide Jurisdictional entity under the See of Peter.
4a. Again ... the "1983 Code" is from the non-Catholic vatican-2 cult founded in 1965 ... automatically excommunicated heretic "john paul 2" could not promulgate legislation for the Catholic Church, which he was not even in ... see Section 36, Sub-part A.
4b. Anything that "john paul 2" sent out ... was not going to the Catholic Church ... it was going out to the vatican-2 heresy (founded on 8 December 1965).
"canon 976" of the "1983 code" to ... Perform Catholic looking, fake Sacramental Confession:
Part I. The Sacraments Title IV. The Sacrament of Penance (Cann. 959 - 997) Chapter II. The Minister of the Sacrament of Penance, Canon 976
Canon 976:
"Even though a priest lacks the faculty to hear confessions, he absolves validly and licitly any penitents whatsoever in danger of death from any censures and sins, even if an approved priest is present."
Catholic refutation:
1. This "canon 976" is heresy ... against the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance as listed in the Council of Florence and the Vatican Council of 1870. These dogmatic decrees state that Catholic Jurisdiction and governance have one and only one source ... under the See of Peter hierarchically, throughout the whole world.
2. The Catholic Dogma on what to do ... for confession when there is no priest available is outlined on Section 10.2 of the website. Confessing your sins to God, with perfect contrition (sorrow for sins because they offend God, not because of the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell) ... together with the disposition of soul that you would go to a priest if one was available ... and a firm purpose of amendment ... places you back into a state of grace.
The Catholic teaching addressing the non-availability of confession is taught three times by the Council of Trent. God knew we were going to be in the situation we are in now regarding the loss of all Catholic property around the world to the vatican-2 heresy ... and disappearance of the Catholic clergy (no one is ordained) ... so that sacramental confession would not be available ... and God does not command impossibilities in terms of getting to Heaven.
3. The Catholic God informs us via the Council of Trent that we are not to go to non-Jurisdictional entities for "confession" ... since there is no such thing as forgiveness of sins outside of the Catholic Church (see the Pope Boniface VIII citation following Trent citations).
The Trent citations are:
Council of Trent, Fourteenth Session, Chapter 4, On Contrition >
Council of Trent, Sixth Session, Chapter 14, on Justification >
By this teaching from the Council of Trent ... if we have the disposition to go to sacramental confession if it was available ... have perfect contrition in confessing our sins directly to God ... and a firm purpose of amendment ... our souls are placed back into a state of grace.
- - - - - - - - - -
And lastly on this point, the Catholic Church has defined that there is no remission of sins outside of the Catholic Church.
So there is no remission of sins in the vatican-2 heretic cult or in any of the fake "traditionalist" groups ... sspx, cmri, sspv, Thuc line, independents, etc.
By the below Ex-Cathedra statement there is no sacramental absolution of sins in the vatican-2 cult or in the other ... Dogma violating non-Jurisdictional groups ("sspx" , "sspv", "Thuc line", "cmri", other "independents", etc.)
Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, 18 Nov 1302, Ex-Cathedra >
4b. Anything that "john paul 2" sent out ... was not going to the Catholic Church ... it was going out to the vatican-2 heresy (founded on 8 December 1965).
"canon 1335" of the "1983 code" to ... set up Catholic looking non-Catholic liturgies and Catholic looking, fake Sacramental Confession:
Part I. Delicts and Penalties in General Title IV. Penalties and other Punishments (Cann. 1331 - 1340) Chapter I. Censures, Canon 1335
Canon 1335:
"If a censure prohibits the celebration of sacraments or sacramentals or the placing of an act of governance, the prohibition is suspended whenever it is necessary to care for the faithful in danger of death. If a latae sententiae censure has not been declared, the prohibition is also suspended whenever a member of the faithful requests a sacrament or sacramental or an act of governance; a person is permitted to request this for any just cause."
Catholic refutation:
1. This "Canon 1335" is heresy ... against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. The Church teaching regarding confession when there are no Catholic bishops or priests available (as is the case in these times) ... is stated in the Council of Trent as shown above (under "Canon 976").
2. Automatically excommunicated, un-ordained group leaders of the vatican-2 cult (dressed like priests) ... cannot, of course, absolve sins. The fake "priests" in the heretic "traditionalist" groups ... cannot absolve sins, these groups include the ... "sspx" , "sspv", "Thuc line", "cmri", other "independents", etc.
3a. Regarding the text "latae sententiae" --> Everyone who is a physical member of the vatican-2 cult is already automatically excommunicated for physical participation in a heretical society. So the entire subject of this "Canon 1335" regarding Catholic censure is overcome and made irrelevant by other events (the establishment of heretical societies).
3b. Regarding the text "latae sententiae" --> Everyone who is a physical member of ... "sspx" , "sspv", "Thuc line", "cmri", other "independents" ... is already automatically excommunicated for physical participation in a heretical society.
3c. Regarding the text "If a latae sententiae censure has not been declared" --> This is a totally nonsensical statement ... since the very meaning of latae sententiae ... is that the excommunication is automatic ... judgement is already ... no "declaration" is needed.
4a. Regarding the text "whenever a member of the faithful requests" --> This phrase has no application because the entire canon is heresy against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.
4b. Regarding the text "whenever a member of the faithful requests" --> There is no point at all ... in the faithful requesting anything ... since there are no priests or bishops to make requests to.
5a. Again ... the "1983 Code" is from the non-Catholic vatican-2 cult founded in 1965 ... automatically excommunicated heretic "john paul 2" could not promulgate legislation for the Catholic Church, which he was not even in (proven on Section 36, Sub-part A of this site).
5b. Anything that "john paul 2" sent out ... was not going to the Catholic Church ... it was going out to the vatican-2 heresy (founded on 8 December 1965).
Please also see: Sections 105, 105.2, 105.3, 105.4, and 105.5 ... ~ ~ ~ ~
<<< --- <<< --- <<<
--- <<< --- End Section 105.3 --- >>> ---
>>> --- >>> --- >>>
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Our Lady of Good Remedy ~ Our Lady of La Salette ~
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Wear the Brown Scapular as the Blessed Virgin instructed us ... as Our Lady of Mount Carmel ~
Truth of the super-natural order:
Ignorance of God's Catholic Dogma ... which is being aggressively hidden with malice ... is not a "loophole" into Heaven.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
